This is the report I supplied to the President. This is me being 100% transparent so you see it as I sent it.
POTUS PATH OF VOTER ROLL PAUSE TO PROTECT THE MIDTERMS
Opportunity Created Out Of Crisis:
Jan. 6, 2017
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Statement by Secretary Jeh Johnson on the Designation of Election Infrastructure as a Critical Infrastructure Subsector (Jan. 6, 2017). In that statement, Johnson says he determined election infrastructure should be designated “as a subsector of the existing Government Facilities critical infrastructure sector.”
The official definition is from DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson’s 2017 designation statement. He described “election infrastructure” as including:
· storage facilities
· polling places
· centralized vote tabulation locations
· and the information and communications technology used to support elections, including:
o voter registration databases
o voting machines
o other systems to manage the election process and report/display results on behalf of state and local governments.
THE ISSUE: GENERAL ELECTION OF 2020
Considering there are numerous lingering questions regarding the running and administration of the 2020 General Election and considering the ongoing investigations in Fluton County Georgia and Maricopa County, Arizona, it is our recommendation that the President, under the 42 U.S.C. § 5195c(e) and more specifically “election infrastructure” subsector of the existing Government Facilities Sector, the President of The United States direct DHS/DOJ to begin a critical forensic investigation of the integrity, authenticity, accuracy and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America.
At this time, the President Of The United States believes the preponderance of evidence supports the elections in the United States has been compromised in several nefarious ways. Even though there are indications there are multiple methods of conducting nefarious activities within any given election held within the United States with its current infrastructure, rules, laws, and oversight, we will focus our efforts SOLEY on the individual voter rolls of each State and Country within the United States.
Therefore, it is recommended during this investigation the use of said voter rolls, backups, poll books and archives version of said voter rolls (in any version) prior to the date of this action, be temporarily suspended until such a time that the integrity, authenticity, accuracy and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America can be confirmed.
This in NO MANNER will prevent anyone, regardless of race, color, or creed, from casting a ballot in the 2026 Midterms. All procedures will be the same and no laws will be changed nor new laws instituted. For the 2026 mid-terms general mail-in ballots will be adjusted in the fact no mail-in ballots (except for medical reasons or UOCAVA) will be printed for execution of the election. Voters, during this investigation and temporary suspended use of the existing voter rolls will be able to cast their ballot in person by identifying themselves with approved ID and showing up at their proper voting Precinct.
Each county may select to print a voting day and precinct reminder notices to all voters well in advance of the election so as not to disenfranchise anyone from their right to cast their ballot.
If for any reason, anyone showing up to cast their ballot does not have the proper ID or has inadvertently gone to the wrong voting Precinct, they will then be given a Provisional Ballot (as normal procedure), and such Provisional Ballots will be cured in accordance with normal procedures and enhanced security and transparency guidelines which will be temporary.
It is possible that election day – end of day – vote tallies may not be available in total, but since over the last three election periods final ballot counting has been delayed from 3 weeks to 2 months, the Provisional curing process and final vote tally should not be a problem.
Every person who shows up on election day will be allowed to cast their ballot and no one will be turned away from casting their ballot.
PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ROLE:
The Constitution’s Article II, Section 3 says the President “shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” That is the main constitutional duty relevant here.
What that means for critical infrastructure:
Under federal critical-infrastructure policy, the President’s role is to:
- set national policy / direction,
- supervise the executive branch,
- and ensure agencies (especially DHS/CISA and sector agencies) carry out their assigned responsibilities.
PPD-21 states national policy is to strengthen critical infrastructure security/resilience and frames it as a shared responsibility among federal, state, local, tribal, territorial governments, and private owners/operators. It also says the federal government must strengthen its own infrastructure and partner effectively with owners/operators.
The President must act within existing constitutional and statutory authority. PPD-21 and related directives organize coordination; they do not create unlimited command power.
PPD-21 says: Federal agencies (led by DHS) must coordinate with sector agencies and state/local/private partners to identify risks, share information, aid, and improve resilience of critical infrastructure within existing law.
The lead role for this investigation of the Voter Rolls used within the United States election the President assigns DHS the lead coordinating role for the forensic investigation and audit of the integrity, authenticity, accuracy, and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America
The Secretary of Homeland Security is directed to:
- provide strategic guidance,
- coordinate the overall federal effort,
- identify/prioritize infrastructure,
- maintain national critical infrastructure centers,
- provide technical assistance,
- coordinate responses to significant cyber/physical incidents (consistent with statutory authority).
· Public/private owners and operators of infrastructure.
If needed, DHS will assign Sector-Specific Agencies (SSAs) roles. Each critical infrastructure sector has a designated federal agency that acts as the day-to-day interface and provides sector expertise, technical assistance, and coordination. It requires agencies to protect privacy/civil liberties and follow existing laws. Federal agencies must implement PPD-21 consistent with applicable law, regulations, and protections for:
- Privacy – all the specific details of the individual records of the Voter Rolls will be kept private during the investigation and will only be share with the investigative teams.
- Civil Rights – this investigation will ensure every legal voter contained within the Voter Rolls is treated equally under the law and is not denied freedoms or opportunities because of race, sex, religion, disability, national origin, or other protected characteristics. It includes laws, courts, and government actions that prevent discrimination and defend rights such as voting, free speech, due process, and equal access.
- Civil Liberties - this investigation will ensure safeguarding individual freedoms from government overreach, such as freedom of speech, religion, privacy, and due process. It ensures the government must follow the Constitution and cannot unfairly restrict a person’s basic rights without lawful justification.
Because the President supervises the executive branch and must ensure laws are faithfully executed, the President hereby directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to use any and all at its disposal to examine DHS procedures, conduct internal reviews, prioritize enforcement/investigations, or assess compliance/security risks as they relate to the Voter Rolls and the effectiveness and efficacy of the Election Assistance Commission and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security).
Within this, DHS procedures (including CISA, FEMA, TSA, CBP, etc.) and State government procedures (like state election administration): DHS in no manner is taking over state functions.
The President further directs CISA (CISA provides election security services to state/local partners) under the direction and guidance of DHS and additionally because election infrastructure is designated as critical infrastructure, the President (through the DHS Secretary) can direct CISA to:
- Cooperate and Assist DHS in the forensic examination of the integrity, authenticity, accuracy, and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America can be confirmed.
- Audit DHS/CISA election-security programs and procedures (internal review)
- Assess compliance with DHS/CISA policy, grant requirements, and internal controls.
- Review security posture and risks in federal support systems.
- Conduct or offer cybersecurity assessments / incident response support to state and local election officials as they specifically relate to the operation, maintaining and voter registration additions or deletions within the State or Counties Voter Rolls.
- Evaluate whether current DHS/CISA election services are effective / lawful / properly scoped.
CISA’s ROLE: - KREBS CONUNDRUM - November 29, 2020
CISA’s role is to be the federal government’s lead civilian agency for cybersecurity and critical infrastructure protection including supporting election infrastructure security.
In practice, CISA’s election role includes:
· Cybersecurity assessments and risk/vulnerability testing
· Threat information sharing and alerts.
· Incident response assistance (when requested / coordinated)
· Physical security assessments and protective guidance
· Training, tabletop exercises, and best-practice guidance for election officials
November 29, 2020, Chris Krebs stated that the 2020 election was the most secure in American history during a CBS interview. At the time Krebs was the Director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
Traditionally, to begin a detailed and focused investigation of the management and execution of elections in the United States of America activities begin with a coordinated request by CISA. This normally would include CISA issues an alert / advisory and recommended mitigations (patch now, isolate system, disable feature, etc.).
Contrary to Chris Krebs statement to CBS in his official capacity as Director of Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, at the time of his interview At least 16 states were still in the count/canvass/certification phase on Nov. 29, 2020 (using certification status as a proxy), and Ballotpedia’s 2020 election finalization summary says 14 states + D.C. had certification deadlines in December, and 3 states had no fixed deadline (HI, RI, TN). That means many jurisdictions were still not finalized by late November. Additionally, Arizona and Wisconsin certified on Nov. 30, 2020, so they were still in process on Nov. 29.
The specific list of certified counts, thus closing of the election officially were:
Based on the evidence, Director Kreb has no direct information or facts (including final counts) which would enable his to confidently state “the 2020 election was the most secure in American history”.
States (22) not yet certified/finalized by Nov. 29, 2020
- Arizona (11/30/2020)
- California (12/11/2020; presidential contest 12/5/2020)
- Colorado (11/30/2020)
- Connecticut (12/03/2020)
- Hawaii (Not specified)
- Illinois (12/04/2020)
- Iowa (11/30/2020)
- Kansas (12/01/2020)
- Maryland (12/08/2020)
- Missouri (12/08/2020)
- Montana (11/30/2020)
- Nebraska (11/30/2020)
- New Hampshire (12/02/2020)
- New Jersey (12/08/2020)
- New York (12/07/2020)
- Oregon (12/03/2020)
- Rhode Island (Not specified)
- Tennessee (Not specified)
- Texas (12/03/2020)
- Washington (12/03/2020)
- West Virginia (12/03/2020)
- Wisconsin (12/01/2020 deadline listed)
Plus - District of Columbia (12/02/2020)
Additionally, at the time of Krebs statement to CBS there were 8 states + D.C. (9 jurisdictions total) by that date, which had open election lawsuits. These states are Arizona, District of Columbia, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. At time there may have been as many as fifty in process unsettled post-election laws suits.
None of these lawsuits were allowed to present evidence and CISA undertook no investigatory actions to test the validity of their claims. This again makes it impossible for the assertion of Chris Krebs to be truthful.
In direct opposition to the CISA statements DOJ + DHS (including FBI and CISA). In their March 2021 joint statement, they said foreign actors (including Russian, Chinese, and Iranian government-affiliated actors) “materially impacted the security of certain networks” during the 2020 federal elections.
DOJ, DHS, FBI, CISA, ODNI/IC, GAO, and DHS OIG publicly acknowledged security-related issues/threats/challenges tied to the 2020 election period. This special investigation is directly tied to the security-related issues/threats/challenges tired to the 2020 election but has nothing to do with any votes being changes, but how these acknowledged issues may have impacted the voter rolls and voter lists management.
PROCEEDURES: THE NORM VERSUS EMERGENCY
In non-emergency or non-national security critical times, the recommended method for conducting these measures would be as follows, if the laws or rules were proposed to be changed as the result of security issues:
1. CISA would issue security determination and technical evaluation.
2. The State would be notified of such issues.
3. New laws would be drafted and go through the normal House and Senate procedural process.
The above is the normal process and can be a lengthy process, however when something is an emergency or critical infrastructure issue certain things can be done to accelerate the process. However, the key to remembering this is NOT FOR FORCING OR EVEN INSTITUTING ANY NEWS LAWS. This action is within the laws and only confirms the investigation regarding the use of said voter rolls, backups, poll books and archives version of said voter rolls (in any version) AND the temporarily suspended use of all Voter Rolls until such a time that the integrity, authenticity, accuracy and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America can be confirmed.
NO LAWS ARE CHANGED NO INDIVIDUAL IS PREVENT FROM CASTING A BALLOT
The best path to accomplishing such is to get an emergency temporary restraining order (TRO) / preliminary injunction, the party asking (Trump/DOJ/etc.) to allow for this investigation the use of said voter rolls, backups, poll books and archives version of said voter rolls (in any version) prior to the date of this action, be temporarily suspended until such a time that the integrity, authenticity, accuracy and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America can be confirmed.
An emergency temporary restraining order (TRO) must show the classic factors:
· Likelihood of success on the merits - How likely a person or party is to win the case based on the actual law and facts (not just procedural issues). This investigation is only a continuation and security evaluation and check up based on items already claimed by DOJ, DHS, FBI, CISA, ODNI/IC, GAO, and DHS OIG in previously published reports.
· Irreparable harm without the order – if in fact there are issues with publicly acknowledged security-related issues/threats/challenges tied to the 2020 election period and they were to go thoroughly uninspected, ill managed or not forensically examined, then such would cause Irreparable harm to both the American Voter and the United States of America.
o Noting the President Of The United States take an oath to faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
(Article II, Section 1, Clause 8) , and; the general federal oath of office of the DHS, DOJ and other in federal office is to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic...”
(5 U.S.C. § 3331)
It is the undertaking of this forensic investigation of our Critical Infrastructure which can faithfully assure these oaths are exercised and no irreparable harm is cause to both the American Voter and the United States of America.
· Balance of equities is required to favor the order. This is defined as:
A judge asks:
o If I grant this request, who gets hurt and how much?
§ Under this order no laws are changed, and no one is not allowed to cast a ballot. This is an investigation to assure COMPLIANCE and SECURITY ONLY!
o If I deny it, who gets hurt and how much?
§ If this order is denied, the whole of our government and citizens have lost faith in our elections will be harmed. If people do not have faith in our elections, they will stop participating and America as we know it will be irreparably harm by poor voter turnout.
o Which result is fairer while the case is still being decided?
§ Since no laws are being change and no one will be prevented from casting their ballot, this is no way affects the American citizen and the audit of the integrity, authenticity, accuracy and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America is in the best interests of the Federal government, State government and The Citizens of The United States of America and is both expected and demanded.
· Public interest favors the order.
o A judge considers whether issuing the TRO would help protect things the public cares about, such as:
§ public safety
§ constitutional rights
§ fair elections / lawful procedures
§ health
§ order and stability.
§ enforcement of the law
Each step in this investigation protects public safety, constitutional rights, fair elections/lawful procedures, health, order and stability and the enforcement of law.
RECAP OF REQUEST:
1. No legal voter will be denied their right to cast their ballot.
2. No laws (State or Federal) are being changed or dropped.
3. This is only a security and forensic review of possible and know election security issues - are issues with publicly acknowledged security-related issues/threats/challenges tied to the 2020 election period – as reported by DOJ, DHS, FBI, CISA, ODNI/IC, GAO, and DHS OIG
4. This is only a temporary request for “the voter rolls be temporarily suspended until such a time that the integrity, authenticity, accuracy and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America can be confirmed.”
5. In such as the suspension is in place while the investigation is underway, and for the foreseeable 2026 mid-terms, general mail-in ballots will be adjusted in the fact no mail-in ballots (except for medical reasons or UOCAVA) will be printed for execution of the election. Voters, during this investigation and temporary suspended use of the existing voter rolls will be able to cast their ballot in person by identifying themselves with approved ID and showing up at their proper voting Precinct.
6. Once the investigation is complete, forensic risk assessment is done and no known security threats continue to exist and the investigation can confirm that the integrity, authenticity, accuracy and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America are safe and secure, the Voter Roll use can reopen and be used provide any needed security changes and protection procedures are implemented and active.
SPECIAL CONSIDERATION AND EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES
Considering the House passed the SAVE Act (H.R. 22) and sent it to the Senate on April 10, 2025; Congress.gov still shows it as “Passed House” and the latest action as received in the Senate, not enacted it is apparent, even in the most basic of needs and circumstance, Mitch McConnell is the Chair of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee is not “acting as fast as possible”, thus inaction – this is why an emergency court order is needed.
Furthermore, tremendous evidence has come forward which further shows just how imperiled the elections of the United State of America are, such as:
NON-CITIZENS ON THE VOTER ROLLS:
· Iowa: 277 confirmed noncitizens on the rolls (and it separately reported thirty-five noncitizens voted in the 2024 general election review).
· Texas: reported 2,724 “potential noncitizens” (not “confirmed” in the announcement; counties investigate).
· Louisiana: reported 390 people who they believe are noncitizens on the rolls, and seventy-nine who voted at least once (their announcement frames this as an investigation with notice and opportunity to prove citizenship).
· As of this report Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Ohio, Texas, Utah, Michigan, Florida, Louisiana, Virginia, and Colorado (24% of the states and suspected to be as high as 60%)
KNOWN VOTER ROLL HACKS
· Voter Rolls Hacks/Theft and Attempted Hacks has been reported and documented in
o Arizona
o Illinois
o Michigan
o Alaska
o Kentucky
o Wisconsin
o Forty-two percent of the State have reported such activities and in 2016 Russia election-cyber targeting figures that are most often cited, the commonly reported number is twenty-one states targeted.
INSIDE JOB - KNOWN VOTER ROLL HACKS
· Voter Rolls Hacks/Theft and Attempted Hacks has been reported and documented to have been at the hands of employees, officials or subcontractors have been reported in
o Arkansas
o Connecticut
o Michigan
o North Carolina
o Virginia
o Oregon
o Iowa
o Texas
o Michigan
o South Dakota
o Documented 20% of the States
FURTHER CONFIRMING EVIDENCE ACTION NEEDS TO BE TAKEN NOW:
Major U.S. government “confirming” reports of compromises and question regarding the security of the elections and election systems utilized in the United States of America:
1. ODNI Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) — Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections (Jan 6, 2017).
2. DHS/FBI Joint Analysis Report (JAR) — GRIZZLY STEPPE – Russian Malicious Cyber Activity (Dec 29, 2016).
3. Joint DHS/ODNI/FBI public statement attributing Russian malicious cyber activity (Dec 29, 2016).
4. U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) Volume I (2019) — part of the 5-volume Russia report.
5. SSCI Volume II (2019) — same series.
6. SSCI Volume III (2019) — same series.
7. SSCI Volume IV (2020) — same series.
8. SSCI Volume V (2020) — same series (final volume).
9. DOJ Special Counsel Report (Mueller Report) — Report on the Investigation into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election (public release 2019).
10. House Intelligence Committee “Russia Investigation Report” (2018) — also affirms Russian active measures and discusses cyber/influence activity.
High-impact, widely cited peer-reviewed empirical studies regarding contested elections and election security and foreign interference:
1. Assessing the IRA’s impact / exposure & effects (PNAS, 2020)
2. Exposure to IRA campaign on Twitter and relationship to attitudes/voting (Nat. Communications, 2023)
3. Troll Factories: manufacturing specialized disinformation on Twitter (Political Communication, 2020)
4. Cross-platform state propaganda: Russian trolls on Twitter & YouTube (Intl. Journal of Press/Politics, 2020)
5. Reduced trolling on Russian holidays (PLOS ONE, 2022)
6. Who falls for online political manipulation? (ACM conference proceedings, 2019)
7. Engagement/coordination dynamics of IRA operations (Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 2020 — peer-reviewed)
8. Reflexive control / cognitive vulnerability in 2016 election (peer-reviewed journal on JSTOR, 2019)
9. Bail et al. (2020) — Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency’s impact… (PNAS).
10. Eady et al. (2023) — Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign… (Nature Communications).
11. Linvill & Warren (2020) — Troll Factories: Manufacturing Specialized Disinformation on Twitter (Political Communication).
12. Linvill & Warren (2020) — Engaging with others: How the IRA coordinated information operation made friends (HKS Misinformation Review — peer reviewed; PDF link on page).
13. Simchon et al. (2022) — Troll and divide: the language of online polarization (PNAS Nexus; includes IRA context and analysis).
14. Linvill et al. (2019) — “The Russians are hacking my brain!”… (Computers in Human Behavior; IRA tweet tactics).
ADDITIONAL RECAP:
· No legal voter will be denied their right to cast their ballot.
· No laws (State or Federal) are being changed or dropped.
· This is only a security and forensic review of possible and know election security issues - are issues with publicly acknowledged security-related issues/threats/challenges tied to the 2020 election period – as reported by DOJ, DHS, FBI, CISA, ODNI/IC, GAO, and DHS OIG
· This is only a temporary request for “the voter rolls be temporarily suspended until such a time that the integrity, authenticity, accuracy and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America can be confirmed.”
· In such as the suspension is in place while the investigation is underway, and for the foreseeable 2026 mid-terms, general mail-in ballots will be adjusted in the fact no mail-in ballots (except for medical reasons or UOCAVA) will be printed for execution of the election. Voters, during this investigation and temporary suspended use of the existing voter rolls will be able to cast their ballot in person by identifying themselves with approved ID and showing up at their proper voting Precinct.
· Once the investigation is complete, forensic risk assessment is done and no known security threats continue to exist and the investigation can confirm that the integrity, authenticity, accuracy and efficacy the voter rolls of each State of the United States of America are safe and secure, the Voter Roll use can reopen and be used provide any needed security changes and protection procedures are implemented and active.
